Home | Libraries | People | FAQ | More |
Almost everything is a function in the Phoenix library that can be evaluated
as f(a1, a2, ..., a/n/)
, where n is the function's
arity, or number of arguments that the function expects. Operators are also
functions. For example, a + b
is just
a function with arity == 2 (or binary). a
+ b
is the same as add(a, b)
, a
+ b + c
is the
same as add(add(a, b),
c)
.
Note | |
---|---|
Amusingly, functions may even return functions. We shall see what this means in a short while. |
Think of a function as a black box. You pass arguments and it returns something back. The figure below depicts the typical scenario.
A fully evaluated function is one in which all the arguments are given. All
functions in plain C++ are fully evaluated. When you call the sin(x)
function, you have to pass a number x. The
function will return a result in return: the sin of x. When you call the add(x, y)
function, you have to pass two numbers x and y. The function will return the
sum of the two numbers. The figure below is a fully evaluated add
function.
A partially applied function, on the other hand, is one in which not all the
arguments are supplied. If we are able to partially apply the function add
above, we may pass only the first argument.
In doing so, the function does not have all the required information it needs
to perform its task to compute and return a result. What it returns instead
is another function, a lambda function. Unlike the original add
function which has an arity of 2, the resulting lambda function has an arity
of 1. Why? because we already supplied part of the input: 2
Now, when we shove in a number into our lambda function, it will return 2 plus
whatever we pass in. The lambda function essentially remembers 1) the original
function, add
, and 2) the partial
input, 2. The figure below illustrates a case where we pass 3 to our lambda
function, which then returns 5:
Obviously, partially applying the add
function, as we see above, cannot be done directly in C++ where we are expected
to supply all the arguments that a function expects. That's where the Phoenix
library comes in. The library provides the facilities to do partial function
application. And even more, with Phoenix, these resulting functions won't be
black boxes anymore.
So, what's all the fuss? What makes partial function application so useful? Recall our original example in the previous section:
std::find_if(c.begin(), c.end(), arg1 % 2 == 1)
The expression arg1 %
2 == 1
evaluates to a lambda function. arg1
is a placeholder for an argument to
be supplied later. Hence, since there's only one unsupplied argument, the lambda
function has an arity 1. It just so happens that find_if
supplies the unsupplied argument as it loops from c.begin()
to c.end()
.
Note | |
---|---|
Higher order functions are functions which can take other functions as arguments, and may also return functions as results. Higher order functions are functions that are treated like any other objects and can be used as arguments and return values from functions. |
In Phoenix, to put it more accurately, function evaluation has two stages:
The first stage is handled by a set of generator functions. These are your front ends (in the client's perspective). These generators create (through partial function application), higher order functions that can be passed on just like any other function pointer or function object. The second stage, the actual function call, can be invoked or executed anytime in the future, or not at all; hence "lazy".
If we look more closely, the first step involves partial function application:
arg1 % 2 == 1
The second step is the actual function invocation (done inside the find_if
function. These are the back-ends
(often, the final invocation is never actually seen by the client). In our
example, the find_if
, if we
take a look inside, we'll see something like:
template <class InputIterator, class Predicate> InputIterator find_if(InputIterator first, InputIterator last, Predicate pred) { while (first != last && !pred(*first)) // <--- The lambda function is called here ++first; // passing in *first return first; }
Again, typically, we, as clients, see only the first step. However, in this document and in the examples and tests provided, don't be surprised to see the first and second steps juxtaposed in order to illustrate the complete semantics of Phoenix expressions. Examples:
int x = 1; int y = 2; std::cout << (arg1 % 2 == 1)(x) << std::endl; // prints 1 or true std::cout << (arg1 % 2 == 1)(y) << std::endl; // prints 0 or false
Usually, we, as clients, write the call-back functions while libraries (such
as STL) provide the callee (e.g. find_if
).
In case the role is reversed, e.g. if you have to write an STL algorithm that
takes in a predicate, or develop a GUI library that accepts event handlers,
you have to be aware of a little known problem in C++ called the "Forwarding
Function Problem".
Look again at the code above:
(arg1 % 2 == 1)(x)
Notice that, in the second-stage (the final evaluation), we used a variable
x
.
In Phoenix we emulated perfect forwarding through preprocessor macros generating code to allow const and non-const references.
We generate these second-stage overloads for Phoenix expression up to BOOST_PHOENIX_PERFECT_FORWARD_LIMIT
Note | |
---|---|
You can set |
Unless otherwise noted, Phoenix generated functions are fully polymorphic.
For instance, the add
example
above can apply to integers, floating points, user defined complex numbers
or even strings. Example:
std::string h("Hello"); char const* w = " World"; std::string r = add(arg1, arg2)(h, w);
evaluates to std::string("Hello
World")
. The observant
reader might notice that this function call in fact takes in heterogeneous
arguments where arg1
is of
type std::string
and arg2
is of type char const*
. add
still works because the C++ standard library allows the expression a + b
where a
is a std::string
and b
is a char
const*
.